“-the BBC may be unintentionally promoting a particular perspective that compromises its commitment to impartiality.” With BBC staff employed through DEI and strong influence by gender ideology extremist organisations, the first being Stonewall, I sincerely doubt “Our” once beloved BBC is doing this unintentionally.
They really ought to look at their totally one sided view of the impact on women and girls, too. I'm an actual female with gender issues, my opposition is based on my needs, but people like me are presented as the same as 'the far right' (neo)'Nazi's' & the 'Christian Right'. FFS I'm a middle aged, autistic, Neo pagan. The groups on the far right hate women like me nearly as much as the TransActivists do.
Completely agree. No mention of the WPATH scandal. Calling rapists and violent criminals ‘she’ on their News website; never talking to Helen Joyce; lamentable uncritical ‘political’ comedy; Women’s Hour accepting the concept of male lesbians, without question; celebrating a young girls’ double mastectomy during pride week; gazillion stories about drag queens; minimal concern for children’s safety…. Unanswered questions about Fergus Walsh. Why wouldn’t he report on WPATH? BBC style guide is always used as an excuse if you complain to them about misleading language (mis-sexing rapists etc..). A once fine institution turns out to be a lamely conformist supporter of an unscientific ideology. Fact checkers, and ‘More of Less’ programmes make this whole thing unforgivable.
I have sent a request to their Verify Unit to verify the sex of Barbra Banda, whom the BBC presents us with as a nominee for its Woman Footballer of the Year. Banda, itseems likely, is a male with a DSD like Caster Semenya (the BBC has never acknowledged that Semenya is not female, referring to him as 'a woman with high testosterone', not a male with 5-ARD)
Yes with all the wonderful women available, who have worked to achieve excellence in their chosen field, (without the unfair but completely relevant advantage of male puberty) it feels like deliberate provocation to chose a male for the best woman. It also says they don't have any respect for women in football.
Yes, provocation is the word. It feels as if this is a deliberate F U. When you look at their sports coverage on the website there is no consistency. They actually did a bit better in explaining in detail what was happening with the two male boxers in the Olympics, but then we have, once again, this lazy Virtue Signalling, it seems in an effort to provide to 'balance' to satisfy the transactivists amongst its employees or to get Brownie Points from Global Butterflies or whoever the hell is controlling their editorial output now
This chimes with the Brianna Ghey case. Yes, Brianna was "trans", but that absolutely wasn't the reason for her being murdered by two confused teenagers. The coverage generated by this story absolutely played up the "genocide" claims and even generated comments in parliament about "insensitive" remarks made on the day the Ghey parents were present. If the two killers had murdered any of their other targets, all of this would be irrelevant, although their motives were exactly the same.
“-the BBC may be unintentionally promoting a particular perspective that compromises its commitment to impartiality.” With BBC staff employed through DEI and strong influence by gender ideology extremist organisations, the first being Stonewall, I sincerely doubt “Our” once beloved BBC is doing this unintentionally.
They really ought to look at their totally one sided view of the impact on women and girls, too. I'm an actual female with gender issues, my opposition is based on my needs, but people like me are presented as the same as 'the far right' (neo)'Nazi's' & the 'Christian Right'. FFS I'm a middle aged, autistic, Neo pagan. The groups on the far right hate women like me nearly as much as the TransActivists do.
Completely agree. No mention of the WPATH scandal. Calling rapists and violent criminals ‘she’ on their News website; never talking to Helen Joyce; lamentable uncritical ‘political’ comedy; Women’s Hour accepting the concept of male lesbians, without question; celebrating a young girls’ double mastectomy during pride week; gazillion stories about drag queens; minimal concern for children’s safety…. Unanswered questions about Fergus Walsh. Why wouldn’t he report on WPATH? BBC style guide is always used as an excuse if you complain to them about misleading language (mis-sexing rapists etc..). A once fine institution turns out to be a lamely conformist supporter of an unscientific ideology. Fact checkers, and ‘More of Less’ programmes make this whole thing unforgivable.
I have sent a request to their Verify Unit to verify the sex of Barbra Banda, whom the BBC presents us with as a nominee for its Woman Footballer of the Year. Banda, itseems likely, is a male with a DSD like Caster Semenya (the BBC has never acknowledged that Semenya is not female, referring to him as 'a woman with high testosterone', not a male with 5-ARD)
Yes with all the wonderful women available, who have worked to achieve excellence in their chosen field, (without the unfair but completely relevant advantage of male puberty) it feels like deliberate provocation to chose a male for the best woman. It also says they don't have any respect for women in football.
Yes, provocation is the word. It feels as if this is a deliberate F U. When you look at their sports coverage on the website there is no consistency. They actually did a bit better in explaining in detail what was happening with the two male boxers in the Olympics, but then we have, once again, this lazy Virtue Signalling, it seems in an effort to provide to 'balance' to satisfy the transactivists amongst its employees or to get Brownie Points from Global Butterflies or whoever the hell is controlling their editorial output now
This chimes with the Brianna Ghey case. Yes, Brianna was "trans", but that absolutely wasn't the reason for her being murdered by two confused teenagers. The coverage generated by this story absolutely played up the "genocide" claims and even generated comments in parliament about "insensitive" remarks made on the day the Ghey parents were present. If the two killers had murdered any of their other targets, all of this would be irrelevant, although their motives were exactly the same.