16 Comments
User's avatar
Jeremy Wickins's avatar

That TIMs have been driving the narrative for years isn't a revelation, but stating it so clearly has a power of its own. Thank you.

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

Yes - everybody knows it but sometimes it feels like people become inured to it. We mustn’t let that happen.

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

I think it's well known, but the details need retelling. It's possible even BBC journalists don't know that the self-identification mandate came originally as a direct and simple response to gender identity activism. The story has to be told.

Expand full comment
Jeremy Wickins's avatar

No argument from me there.

Expand full comment
Jim McNeill🇬🇧SDP's avatar

Thank for this, excellent, and really needed saying

Expand full comment
Suze's avatar

The BBC has betrayed a nation with the gender bollox they’ve been spouting for much longer than I realised. Fabulous piece. I wish I could pin open the eyelids of everyone in the UK and force them to read this. Appreciate all your work!

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

Thank you so much!

Expand full comment
wolfstar's avatar

This prompted me to dig up some feedback that I submitted to the BBC News website in December 2017:

"The site has gone insanely clickbaity over the past 12 months, prioritising - at least on the front page - banal human interest stories (or pseudo-stories) over informational relevance. It's offputting. You can't use clicks as a metric for your product, because it's not a product - it's a public service. You have fantastic journalists, so that's not the problem: it's a question of editorial decision-making. You need to stimulate readers and deliver reliable, responsible journalism that informs people and at best improves their critical thinking faculties, rather than titillatory emotive content of little news value that - in its tone and presentation - is becoming outright anti-intellectual in its venal appeal to emotion. You're not Buzzfeed or the Daily Mail and you shouldn't be trying to lower yourself to their level; you're better than that, and you're wrecking your own USP. Sober journalism doesn't have to be dry, and more opinion pieces and good news stories on the BBC News website would be good - just stop the facile human interest stories that aim to tug at people's heartstrings in a way that turns their brains to mush. Please. I absolutely wouldn't have said this just a couple of years ago because it wasn't the case then."

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

Wow - this is amazingly observant and prescient. Well done. What a fantastic complaint.

Expand full comment
JoMarch's avatar

Absolutely agree. It's not 'what happened?', it's 'how do you feel?'. Emotional mush.

Expand full comment
Claire Landon's avatar

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Lola Coco Petrovski's avatar

Who's reading all these Lived Experience articles? Aren't the British public over it yet?

Expand full comment
Dusty Masterson's avatar

Thanks, Cath, great reminder of the beginning of the 'trans' infiltration.

Have cross posted

https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/hes-a-man-kellie-jay-keen

Dusty

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

Thank you Dusty

Expand full comment
Peter's avatar

The stories of the Parent of these children are some of the most heartbreaking you'll ever hear. That the BBC have been instrumental in causing this destruction by fueling this cult is a stain on the organisation it should never be allowed to escape from.

Expand full comment
SEENinJournalism's avatar

Agree with you. Lives have been ruined. There must be accountability.

Expand full comment